I do not know if someone has already proposed a theory like this and if they did, then I hope, better to say I am quite sure, they did it with a deeper knowledge of the matter than me. So the bulk idea is very simple, I think money is a symbolic exchanger of energy. In this sense I think natural laws in the economic field, I mean the laws of economics, can be reduced to physical laws in some way.
Do you have any research that can prove or disprove this? No, I have not. And I guess it will be quite hard for me to have a personal research on this matter in the future, giving the fact I am neither a researcher nor a very reach person able to pay researchers…
Maybe someone else will research on this field or they have already worked on it, but I just do not know.
It’s an interesting link and I will explore it when I will have time. What I can say at a first glance is that it seems far different from what I inteded in this post.
The ideas of econophysics as they are presented in that wiki seem to be based on the tentative to find some kind of isomorphism between the laws ruling some well studied physical system and the markets.
I think this could be a blind alley.
The first consequence of my idea is that you cannot create more money (but maybe it could be better to talk of value) than the energy that we are able to extract from our system. Or better if you create more money than that you generate also inflation…
In this sense there is some kind of correspondence between the general quantity of energy available to use by humans and the value of the total amount of money on the planet…
However this is just some kind of fantasy in my mind at this point, and I’ll not been so surprised to judge it mere foolishness in the near future…